twitter facebook linkedin
  • Blog Post 9: BP’s dilemma: In uncertain emerging markets, is it better to partner with the private sector or the state? (by Amitava Chattopadhyay)

    Posted on October 24, 2012 by in Uncategorized

    BP’s dilemma: a choice between partnering with the private sector versus the government in Russia! Is one alternative better than the other in uncertain emerging markets like Russia? It is not as clear cut as one might think. Before elaborating, however, let me underline that I am not talking about emerging markets in general, but about uncertain emerging markets, such as Russia.

    BP is selling its stake in a business that was a partnership with the private sector—AAR, BP’s partner in TNK-BP was a consortium of Russian billionaires. That relationship on the one hand was lucrative for BP, as it received close to $19 billion in dividends against its investment of around $8 billion a decade ago. Moreover, In the current deal, it has been reported that BP will end up with a stake of around 20% in Rosneft as well as cash of the order of $12 billion. So, all in all, BP will make about $35 billion after 9 years on its initial investment of 8 billion. A very good deal indeed, as it turns out.

    However, the BP-AAR relationship has been fraught with acrimony- In 2008, reportedly in a fallout with the AAR partners over payout of dividends versus capital investments, Mr. Dudley ended up suddenly having to leaving Russia, due to his visa status not being renewed, and only last year, the same partners went to court to block BP’s bid to participate in a drilling joint venture with Rosneft, in Russia’s Arctic, leading BP to drop the potential opportunity. So, perhaps, BP could have made even more, but for its private sector partners. Importantly, things could have also turned out much worse for both BP and Mr. Dudley personally, had he not left Russia when he did (see various media reports on this).

    The current deal, beyond the stakes mentioned above, also looks decidedly good, at first glance. It reportedly has the blessing of President Vladimir Putin and is like to pave the way for BP to be able to more aggressively participate in the exploration and drilling in the Russian Arctic, a very attractive opportunity. However, this supposes that the cast of characters involved and their positions will remain as they are today. Should there be a change, which is not unknown in Russia, there could be a change in BP’s fortunes too. BP’s 20% equity share and two seats on Rosneft’s nine-member board is unlikely to give it enough clout to have its way. The Russian state owns 75% of Rosneft!

    At the end of the day, investments in uncertain emerging markets are just that, uncertain. The uncertainty isn’t dramatically different, whether the investments are in partnership with the private sector, or the state. So the way to think about such investments is, is the potential higher than normal upside worth the higher than normal risk. One assumes that BP assessed the bigger upside to be worth the bigger risk.

    If you liked the article, please consider sharing it on:

    You can comment with your Facebook or Yahoo or AOL or Hotmail account:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*